Hi y’all! Sorry for asking so much on this sub! Y’all have been so helpful!
This time, I’m thinking of transitioning from 1Password to a self-hosted option.
Of course I know about Bitwarden, and I’m looking into it now, but are there any other recommendations y’all have? Have y’all heard of and used Passbolt? It seems nice, but it looks like it only does passwords and not other categories like 1Password does.
A few things of note:
I’d like it to have different categories, a la 1Password. (Logins, SSN, ID, member card #, etc)
Maybe multi-user so I can have an account for my wife.
Password generator of course, and I’m not sure if y’all are familiar too much with 1password, but it allows you to customize the fields in each entry. So it starts with the basics (username, password, url), but it allows you to add sections and entries too! I could add a “security” and add my 2FA code on there, my backup codes, etc.
Honestly, that last one is a biggie, so I think I might be talking myself out of moving over now, but I’m sure that AgileBits or whatever the company is called will abandon, if it hasn’t already, 1Password 7 with local vaults, in favor of 1Password 8 that only uses 1password subscription accounts.
Sorry for the rant and wall of text.
Thank y’all in advance.
Update on July 21, 2023
I decided to self-host Vaultwarden as it was designed to be a lightweight (on resources) version of Bitwarden. For Android, I’m using the “Keyguard” app to access my instance, and the official Bitwarden browser extension on my wife’s MacBook. 1password fucked me over, and I had to manually copy every password 1 by 1, luckily I only had ~500 entries.
I’m still doing some research into the best app for android (the official Bitwarden is ugly, and Keyguard is pretty, but I’m still looking around.)
Thank each and every one of you for taking time to answer my question!
I like pass, It’s just a wrapper around standard tools - gpg encrypted files in a directory, with git for version control. You can organize the subfolders however you’d like, and store whatever you want in them. You can sync the files across systems however you’d like - copy/paste, rsync, network drive… You can even go as far as to install a git server, e.g. gitlab, and clone, push, and pull into password synchronization bliss.
Is it just me or does that “comparison” make no sense for this thread. It’s mostly comparing vaultwarden to the cloud version of bitwarden, not the self hosted version. It only mentions the self hosted version in passing. It doesn’t do anything to help someone choose between vaultwarden and self hosted bitwarden
Not sure why someone would. Bitwarden provides their own self-host repos and docs and is working on a unified container instead of docker-compose scripts for their production stack.
I’ve been using their stack for the last 6 years and only issues I’ve ran into were my fault. Also tested their container and will be switching to that soon.
Don’t you have to pay to use premium features on your own server with their official software? With Vaultwarden you get all premium features unlocked for free on an infinite amount of devices.
I would recommend Bitwarden self-hosted with a subscription. I know it’s a unpopular opinion, but they do a great job with the app and let’s be real,if nobody financially supports open source development, we are in for trouble.
There are enough people that don’t have the technical knowledge to host their own instance which happily pay Bitwarden to do so. If I host my own software and pay for the servers myself I’m not gonna pay a monthly fee just to be able to use the software. Maybe a one time payment, but definitely no subscription.
+1 for this, I have an active subscription with Bitwarden, for US$10 a year it’s worth many times that in the value and utility it provides me. I considered self-hosting the service but I decided to just stick with the cloud version since they likely have better resilience than my homelab. It’d suck if my home network is down for whatever reason and I need urgent access to my vault without a local copy within reach.
If you only use Linux CLI and live in the terminal: pass
If you also use a phone or windows desktop, and already use a reputable syncing service (nextcloud, synching, etc.): keepassXC
If you have an always on server, internet accessible that maintains 5-9s of reliability and regular working backupa: host VaultWarden
If nothing above applies: use Bitwarden SaaS.
My big problem with VaultWarden/Bitwarden is there are some things (making new passwords) that can only be done while connected. This means exposing your server to the internet and making it highly available. Also, since it’s a single point of failure, you need good backups. If your server goes down, you’re read only until you create a new instance, which might take a while.
I’ve been using KeepassXC for about 6 years, synchronized with Syncthing. The database is synced to all my devices and my wife’s, and a few satellite devices my friends own in encrypted Syncthing folders. It’s easy to merge conflicts if we both make entries at the same time. My database will likely outlive me at this point. I even got my Luddite in-laws using it (alas, synced through Google Drive). Highly recommended.
The issue I found with this approach is that the other big reason to use VaultWarden is for multi-user support. However, then each of your users need the same VPN setup, which can be hard to manage if you support a non-techie or Luddite.
Exposing it to the internet isnt safe, but it’s more accessible then setting up VPNs for everyone with proper routing and stuff. The actual Bitwarden service isn’t that expensive last time I checked, and I think it’s probably the best, simplest solution if you need to support multiple technophobes.
I just wonder how easy it would be to sync between clients, KeePass style, because you also have to send your GPG keystore around to all your clients too, right?
It’s very easy to just use git to sync, and easy to set up with several different keys, and can be used as a password sharing database in a small devops team.
Since I’m using git to sync, I can easily tell when I’ve last changed any password and optionally keep a history of passwords I’ve used.
It fits well with my life in the terminal, and I use browserpass for Firefox integration.
I would say passbolt it the best, if it would have totp support. At least they are working on it. For different categories you can just create multiple folders
Another vote for selfhosting a VaultWarden (Bitwarden) setup.
I have had it through a docker container for a while, it’s solid, and the browser integration/desktop apps/web access mean my passwords are always close at hand.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !selfhosted@lemmy.world
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.
Rules:
Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
Valutwarden <3
I’m using passwordstore + self hosted git server.
Passwordstore uses gpg for the encryption layer which combine fine with ssh (used to connect to the private repo).
I’m using qtpass as gui and there is also a client for Android named password store
Been doing the same, just leaving my password-store offline, for me this is enough.
I like pass, It’s just a wrapper around standard tools - gpg encrypted files in a directory, with git for version control. You can organize the subfolders however you’d like, and store whatever you want in them. You can sync the files across systems however you’d like - copy/paste, rsync, network drive… You can even go as far as to install a git server, e.g. gitlab, and clone, push, and pull into password synchronization bliss.
You can install Vaultwarden instead of Bitwarden. Differences between Vaultwarden and Bitwarden by reference.
Strongly second vaultwarden, covets so many cases for me.
Also recommend vault warden its what I’ve been using for the past year since lastpass dropped the ball.
It has entries for totp, notes, and you can add more fields as needed. Ive been really happy with it
Is it just me or does that “comparison” make no sense for this thread. It’s mostly comparing vaultwarden to the cloud version of bitwarden, not the self hosted version. It only mentions the self hosted version in passing. It doesn’t do anything to help someone choose between vaultwarden and self hosted bitwarden
Not sure why someone would. Bitwarden provides their own self-host repos and docs and is working on a unified container instead of docker-compose scripts for their production stack.
I’ve been using their stack for the last 6 years and only issues I’ve ran into were my fault. Also tested their container and will be switching to that soon.
Don’t you have to pay to use premium features on your own server with their official software? With Vaultwarden you get all premium features unlocked for free on an infinite amount of devices.
Yes that is true but $10/year for premium is not bad, I donate that much to separate projects per year
I would recommend Bitwarden self-hosted with a subscription. I know it’s a unpopular opinion, but they do a great job with the app and let’s be real,if nobody financially supports open source development, we are in for trouble.
There are enough people that don’t have the technical knowledge to host their own instance which happily pay Bitwarden to do so. If I host my own software and pay for the servers myself I’m not gonna pay a monthly fee just to be able to use the software. Maybe a one time payment, but definitely no subscription.
+1 for this, I have an active subscription with Bitwarden, for US$10 a year it’s worth many times that in the value and utility it provides me. I considered self-hosting the service but I decided to just stick with the cloud version since they likely have better resilience than my homelab. It’d suck if my home network is down for whatever reason and I need urgent access to my vault without a local copy within reach.
enpass for password vault, it has integrated nextcloud sync. for me, adding another selfhosted app wasn’t worth it.
My big problem with VaultWarden/Bitwarden is there are some things (making new passwords) that can only be done while connected. This means exposing your server to the internet and making it highly available. Also, since it’s a single point of failure, you need good backups. If your server goes down, you’re read only until you create a new instance, which might take a while.
I’ve been using KeepassXC for about 6 years, synchronized with Syncthing. The database is synced to all my devices and my wife’s, and a few satellite devices my friends own in encrypted Syncthing folders. It’s easy to merge conflicts if we both make entries at the same time. My database will likely outlive me at this point. I even got my Luddite in-laws using it (alas, synced through Google Drive). Highly recommended.
Great advice.
Only thing I would add is that it is possible to avoid exposing the Vaultwarden server to the Internet. And, you could use Wireguard for that.
The issue I found with this approach is that the other big reason to use VaultWarden is for multi-user support. However, then each of your users need the same VPN setup, which can be hard to manage if you support a non-techie or Luddite.
Exposing it to the internet isnt safe, but it’s more accessible then setting up VPNs for everyone with proper routing and stuff. The actual Bitwarden service isn’t that expensive last time I checked, and I think it’s probably the best, simplest solution if you need to support multiple technophobes.
There are frontends to pass [1] for different systems, including mobile ones ;) and probably the official list is not complete.
edit: For CLI I prefer gopass [2]
[1] https://www.passwordstore.org/#other
[2] https://github.com/gopasspw/gopass
I just wonder how easy it would be to sync between clients, KeePass style, because you also have to send your GPG keystore around to all your clients too, right?
If you already have gpg set up it’s quite easy to just sync it with git. Then your server only needs to be online when you want to sync.
You can (probably should) use different keys per device, and works wonderfully with Yubikey or other gpg hardware keys if you want extra safety.
I highly recommend pass.
It’s very easy to just use git to sync, and easy to set up with several different keys, and can be used as a password sharing database in a small devops team.
Since I’m using git to sync, I can easily tell when I’ve last changed any password and optionally keep a history of passwords I’ve used.
It fits well with my life in the terminal, and I use browserpass for Firefox integration.
+1 for KeePassXC + SyncThing
I would say passbolt it the best, if it would have totp support. At least they are working on it. For different categories you can just create multiple folders
Another vote for selfhosting a VaultWarden (Bitwarden) setup.
I have had it through a docker container for a while, it’s solid, and the browser integration/desktop apps/web access mean my passwords are always close at hand.